One of the false theories is the protection theory of national activity, which prohibits importing foreign goods that can be produced in the country, or the disincentive to such imports by harsh tariffs . If it were correct this theory buy things produced in the country represent benefits for the people of the Republic and buying them would be a "loss" giving preference to those produced in the country, every time they are cheaper or better, there would be damaging event the country.
But is that the goods must be produced at a lower cost than other countries,protectionism Brazilian government repeatedly made one of the most notorious was the computer of the law of the 70 to 80 where you could not buy nor install advanced companies in Brazil, cement since 1940 was protected by imposing unreasonable fees and banning imports that made the wealth of "national" mining.
Led delays amounted make our hand labor and the least efficient capital is still chasing after lost time, so there is a waste of capital and labor required for the production in the country where the merchandise was purchased in another country and the amount national loss thus generated is measured by the price of the surplus which is produced.
The electric car low speed in China, electric costs R $ 6,600 REAI s, no matter due to the protection and who loses, thinking that should produce here, now, these companies want to set up here to sell at this price, not to, you need time, but are able to resell here now.
Supposedly these policies benefit car manufacturers here in the country, although the country think these protections the rates get profits actually excludes the competition and think they make profits continuing with these protecting these companies.
However, prices in the country do not get consumers a savings, but an expense with this protection, so does exports the product to be sold before in the case, commodities and the market is only surplus tend to endear the value the consumer, the country is the king of these and who loses is hand labor.
Does not bring money already, wanting to make a company is required to pay high taxes to export to the country, claims that only those who produce in the country leads advantages that the short term is not feasible because high technologies should be free to entry in the country at the beginning with high costs of taxes loser is the consumer and the merchant and indirectly the State fails to collect the tax intermediaries as INSS, ISS, property taxes, VAT and others.
The artificiality of commodities and still giving export subsidies favor the agricultural sector and the countries that matter, the large volume of raw material coming out of Brazil where aggregate a "certain" profit by importing a steel blade of another country to manufacture the white line which then export and manufacturing at a lower price, practicing here the same international price if sold here for a lower price would increase employment and continue exports.
This logic of protectionism in the country still large obstacle and export subsidies policy inducing other foreign countries to buy from us, before other countries at a lower price artificially produced because these goods in a part of the price being paid with our own taxes, income tax and others.
The merchant little interest this policy, therefore, the country has a large number of contraband and to pay a high tax ends with your funds from your property so there are a lot of tax evasion.
This sistemade restrictions defended by Brazilian businessmen takes a loss to the country, only find in accumulating money and makes the country have indicators of per capita income and its distribution among the world's worst.
With specious claim to give jobs to our workers as if they did not need international competitions saying they would be feeding and sustaining foreign countries, even "leftists and rightists" are equal in this regard.
By taking into account the customs of these, claim supporters of "free trade" who argue that is an alternative to employ our own people and to employ foreigners, but between to employ one category or another of our own population.
All goods are always paid directly or indirectly with the products of the country's own work and open the protectionism criteria they preach can have a greater amount of products, being more productive, because with the same spent working, it can be having a greater number and variety of articles whose prices decrease by chance.
Protectionism of entrepreneurs and also the unions think that should consumption have contingencies in other countries to carry out an agreement that escape the maximum old external control via WTO in its rules place restrictions or a country where there are bilateral agreements to multilateral and even forming a customs Union think that one should have a slowdown in competitiveness and export quotas and imports become limiting competition.
On the other hand certain "competitors" now the payment is in cash which was first acquired and not the goods and will again be replaced by the export of equivalent value for the export of our own independent product if it is a company that wants or no jobs in the country , exchange takes place in the money.
Thus, the more buy and sell freely, no need for the intervention of the Central Bank in its policy to act in the market to reduce the increasing interest money or buy from outside to feed protectionism.
Thus, the volume and input and output on the open market without restrictions countries will have to buy or sell the Brazilian money, however, protectionism and restrictions on open sale and purchase balance the scales always provided that there is competitiveness in the country not matter the country of origin X or Y.
If economic policy is open to all and does not propose barriers to sales in the country is of y and x by prohibiting the importation restrictions, increased domestic purchase, however, the low price of products had emerged at the time, it would be a brief period by both prices would lower both to cease part of import or arise a foreign demand for our products, enough to pay for imports and in this equation there is an opening and thus the trade of the countries would be open and frank and not the lie of liberalism they preach, which keep the prohibitions and restrictions on foreign and domestic goods of economic policy in Brazil and others.
Have not yet learned liberalism that through effect laws on centralism and its organs in time of Brazil are retrograde and Minister Meirelles speaks and contingency accounts public as if it were the only guilty and INSS sheet for the not maintain the old policy Orthodox.
There in the country interference in demand transaction "friends" in business there is no friendship, but profits can not be a preference for x or y country and group or bilateral protectionism that call globalization is far from being competitive.
Protectionism serves only to labor-saving interests since 1980 based on the minimum income on which subsistence in a basket of pain and say "is national defense."
(OBS * based on fundamentals and limits and the Principles of "laissez-faire" or noninterference of John Stuart Mill with placements partaker of the newspaper.)
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário