Brazilian culture there is little identity and we are reaping the fruits: automata and illiberal.

The individuality is one of the well-being of elements should be free to form opinions and express their opinions without reservation, however, the norms and customs can lead to dire consequences for the intellectual. The dogmas, doctrines, ideologies can be obstacles physically or morally, but when there is danger to freedom manifests. The pretense is one of the characteristics and their opinions, negative there will be frustration, unless pernicious breaking the law allowed.

There is enthusiastic crowd riding opinions that come to your home television, internet and other, in the form of tangled acts regardless of their will and nature, which, without justifiable cause, can do harm to others, can be and the most important cases absolutely absorbed by the listener that need to be controlled by the unfavorable feelings that these images when needed by the active interference of the viewers. The freedom of the individual and not massification of idiocy.

Should be limited to; It should not become a nuisance to others the Brazil communications means of passed these limits and we reap today a literal nonsense of programs do not educate and according to his own inclination and judgment in things which concern the same, for the same reasons which show that opinion should be "free", also prove that she hides abuse and carries his views into practice a social cost.

Of course mankind are not infallible; their truths, mostly, are only half-truths; that opinion unit, unless resulting comparison more complete and free of opposite opinions, is not desirable and diversity is not an evil, but a good, but imperfect are the Brazilian media, show different life experiences and is exhausting the "leisure" and repetitive.
This free scope should be given to the character of varieties, without prejudice to others and that the value of different modes of life should be proved in practice, in this case, mass communications, here other countries have not been able to try to improve the individuality, lead to common sense that the characters of the small screen or the Self  of "stories" are the rule of conduct, there is wanting one of the main ingredients of the human being, although momentary these , not a "performance" individual happiness should be the main ingredient of individual and social progress.

In maintaining this principle, the greatest difficulty to be encountered in television programs or movies, assessing the means to an end recognized, but the indifference of the people in general to the end itself and is an intellectual and personal void.

If this were the free development of individuality is one of the basic well-being; which is not only an element of coordination with all who are appointed by civilization terms, literacy, education, culture, then yes, the Brazilian media can be called complex mutt.

It is a danger that liberty should be undervalued, and the adjustment of the boundaries between it and social control presented by ridiculous actors on a Sunday, where the mockery and other backbiting and where individuality is looking real.

 The nonsense and extraordinary difficulty teachers and parents often think it is individual spontaneity and agree and even says and thinks is common modes of thinking as having any intrinsic worth or deserve any respect for their own. Most Brazilians think of humanity as they are now (for them is to do what they are), I can not understand why these forms.

The beginning of our communications always gone through no spontaneity, but think it should be good enough for everyone.

Massification of the operant idealization mode takes a disgrace spontaneity, but the hard part is that this ispart of the ideal of most moral and social reformers, it may even be a nuisance and perhaps rebellious obstruction of a character is more tragedy from Dostoevsky to the general acceptance that these reformers, in their own judgment, think would be best for the Brazilian mediocrity.

Wilhelm VonHumboldt that "the end of man, or what is prescribed by the dictates of reason, eternal and immutable and not suggested by vague desires and transient, is the largest and most harmonious development of his powers to a complete and consistent whole"; that, therefore, the object "in the sense that every human being."

Unceasingly should direct their efforts and especially to those who wish to influence their peers not stereotypes, but in "freedom and variety of situations"; and from the union of these arise "individual vigor and multiple diversity," which combine, there appears individualism.
Individualism is confused with selfishness, or, from a different group, for example, everyone who uses black boot and jacket black and dark shirt is Punk, this is not individualism but stereotype .

In "originality". And not the sameness of cultural programs, the songs "backland" the word drink alcohol appears as sweet, "people are accustomed" to this doctrine and others and reap the fruits, the country ranked third in diseases related to this practice .

Not find as high a value on individuality. Nobody's idea of ​​excellence in conduct that is people should do absolutely nothing but copy one another, there are as copy in Brazil.

I do not want to say that people should not put in their way of life and for the conduct of their concerns, whatever their own judgment, to impress or its own individual character.
On the other hand, it would be absurd to pretend that people should live as if nothing had knowledge of the world before they came to do the same thing as an actor or act may be true unless like experience, but has not yet done anything to show that a mode of existence , or of conduct is preferable to another . No one denies that people should be taught and trained in his youth to meet and benefit from certain results of human experience

But it is the privilege and good condition of a human being, reached the maturity of his mental faculties, use and experience in their own way to interpret. . It is for him to find out what part of recorded experience is properly applicable to their own circumstances and character
are the traditions and customs of other people, to a certain extent, evidence of what their experience has taught them; presumptive evidence, and as such, does not claim to his deference: but, in the first.

Place, their experience may be too narrow as we see in Brazil have played a truth with this reason. Secondly, their interpretation of experience and can be shown correct, but unsuitable for the formation of customary circumstances and customary characters.

And in this situation or his character behind inappropriate ways and not only educational or develop any of the qualities which are the distinctive endowment of a human being.

Where human perception faculties, judgment, discrimination, feeling, mental activity, and even moral preference, are exercised only in making a choice. He who does anything because it is the custom makes no choice. He gains no practice in discerning or in desiring what is best. The mental and moral, like the muscular powers, are improved only by being used.

The faculdadesmentais exercised by our media are called into no exercise of thinking, simply imitate, (will be because of this are called "los macaquitos"), doing something just because others, namely that the heartthrob and star did and do it does no more than to believe in something just because others believe.

If these trainers of opinion are not conclusive for the reason of that person, his reason can not be strengthened, but is likely to be weakened by adopting the "educational" incentives made by writers who give incentives for an act are not as are according consent and their own feelings and character is symbolic and empty, inert and torpid, instead of active and energetic.

Thus, the owners of communications in Brazil leave the Brazilian no choice in their life plans, and find that has no need of any other faculty as imitation apes since the media means were formed by a dominant group in the poor quality of Brazil.

 The oligarchy that since 1500 handles the media made ​​the country we are living an unconscious collective imagination unhealthy.