Yesterday it became clear how fragile the Brazilian Presidential system, the point of an interim president for a house make a damage according to their "thought", and we see how the conduct of a subject of interest that always need to fulfill an agenda of order rate in the session, an evil always called "LOCK TARIFF" Members all the time asking watchword, as in the process, etc.
First, it should be understood that the locking of the agenda is the dismissal of the trial of all legislative procedures in progress in each of the Houses of Congress. In this sense, it provides art. 62 , § 6 , CF that Provisional Measure is not appreciated within forty-fifth day of its publication, will urgently subsequently in each house of Congress.
Should not be confused, because the time limits specified in the legislative process of drafting a provisional measure, namely the deadline for its assessment, which is 60 days, extendable for another 60 days and referred to the agenda of locking which is 45 calendar days from the publication of Provisional Measure.
If the Provisional Measure is not appreciated within 45 days of its publication, there will be the locking of the agenda of the House in which it is being processed, not admitting the vote of any other matter before the completion of the vote on the interim measure.
Finally, it is important to emphasize that even locked the agenda on the 45th day without assessing the Provisional Measure, there will be no interruption of calculating the period of completion of the vote for approval, which is 60 days extendable for another 60 days.
Thus, it is possible that even locked the agenda, the deadline to take place for the conclusion of the legislative process without the Congress have enjoyed the Provisional Measure, in which case it will lose its effectiveness since its issue, by lapse of time.
(Source: SAVI )
The form of government for any given country being (within certain definite conditions) is subject to choice, now considering the test that the choice should be directed; What are the distinctive features of the best equipped form of government to promote the interests of any society?
The presidentialism being showing the future president continued operant so that needs approval of justices commissions that take months to judge a case, take the example of Senator Dulcídio do Amaral and legitimacy checks and approval of budget allocations made by the by the President or the congress agents.
In presidentialism there often a postponement of a simple application that takes unnecessary time if the parliamentarism , this no commissions this or that, the problem informed the parliamentarians themselves that in one sitting can legitimize the activities of the Prime Minister.
With this planning government had become quickly and without a utopian ideology of how it would be best for the country according to their doctrinal views, however, evil exists there the presidentialism lose away to parliamentarism becomes new elections or referendum or plebiscite and dismissal the Prime Minister.
For Although the goodness of a government is necessarily circumscribed within that sphere, its badness unfortunately is not, it is the "vices" to be remedied as soon as possible, in the case of presidentialism has to go through the Committee on Constitution and Justice (CCJ) deferring processing of the "evil" that slows the Public Administration.
But if social existence of capable and experienced parliamentarians need to be evaluated by a smaller group?As if they were children?
And the constitution norms and rules that the executive has to go through this instance also the President is a child? If it has most everything well, but have to negotiate "positions" for those who claim to match its performance, thus is born the clientelism .
Not to mention the indirect effects, the direct interference of public authorities as the case of the Supreme Court , again needs the protection and influence of the government on the welfare of society can be considered, estimated in reference to nothing less that all the interests of a group linked to President - elect.
Therefore obliged to put before ourselves as a good test and bad government, such a complex object as the overall interests of society to promote the various interests, respectively.
It would be a great facility you could say that the good of society consists of such and such elements and need to go through committees and take the effects.
The theory of government would therefore be built from separate theorems of the elements of a good state of society on the one hand the president who is stuck to the limitations and research releases as is being done impeachment. Unfortunately, to enumerate and classify the minimum social welfare that are classified in separate commissions and laws of the deputies.
So how can run a country if every time you urgently need a change have to order and evaluate the middle and end of the act, would therefore presidentialism a child always limited in their action administration .
The order and progress classification (which is a phraseology of French thinkers). The popular speech is easy to say, but what order? Improved presidentialism that adopts the "progress" that this is apparent at first made by a charismatic person who has his ideal "utopian" about the progress of the operating mode.
When progress that both written and spoken on the Brazilian flag is corresponding to the desires of Brazilian society, can be at the head of presidential leadership.
But what is the order? Sometimes it means more, sometimes less, but almost never the whole of what human society needs except improvement and must accept obedience. A government is said to preserve order, if he can be obeyed an improvement for public thing (Republic).
But there are different degrees of obedience that we have seen in the long history of Brazilian presidentialism where clientelism is customary.
There is always an absolute despotism requires that the individual citizen should obey unconditionally every mandate of persons in authority. At least to limit the definition of such terms as are general and issued in the deliberate manner of laws and not behind the "Progress" and "Order."
Thus understood, it is expressed undoubtedly an indispensable attribute of the Presidential government were unable to make their ordinances obeyed, can not be said to rule that demonstrated our system.
We are still looking for a way, that the government should fulfill, distracted the idea of improvement that goes through a patronage from its origin and not always have to be this way.
For this, parliamentarism and a sense a bit longer, order means the preservation of peace by cessation of private violence of a group that uses the forces of its authorities in disputes where the President is negotiating positions.
To have a majority to make a decision to close a modern administration, order and progress are to preserve and increase social welfare.
Where the qualities the citizens individually which leads most to keep the amount of good conduct, good management, success and prosperity that already exist in society and everyone will agree that these qualities are integrity, fairness, and prudence. But are not these, of all qualities, the most conducive to improvement in presidentialism will not progress and order.
However, he has already waved the likelihood of parliamentarism, this is an advance, even now being presidential and distributing positions, or is, clientelism, therefore, it starts badly, we'll see later.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário