What is liberalism personal and collective in the world today? Generates intolerance, oppression, hatred and terrorism?

What feeds the anger, oppression and hatred is the fuel of intolerance is lack of liberalism in which freedom is a spiritual and philosophical search that may lead to terrorism.
Freedom is a subtle demand at all times we are asked what their religion? What is your sexual orientation? What ideology and utopia proclaim? Right or left, socialist or capitalist, etc. and such.

Be liberal is to have more interest and subject clearly and be tolerant of different, ie, the  meaning  of this is respectability and  idea  corresponding to all its consequences  practical   for freedom.

Which corresponds economically and socially, the above questions is intolerance and anger and even hatred.

Individuation Carl Gustav Jung defined as a process by which the human being comes to self - knowledge, and is taken to establish contact with your unconscious, not only with the personal unconscious , but also as theircollective unconscious .

In this integration, which is always the separation of what is aware of what is "not aware". For integration of the archetypes it is necessary to make this distinction, otherwise the conflicts continue or intensify.
The aim of this process or the final step is the arrival in the self, the personality center.

When it comes to this center, the human being is like individuality, as a personality.
The self, which is presented as a project from the beginning of our life, is the model of the complete human being, the mother of all progress of being, the standard by which develop the personality characteristics of each. His presentation from the beginning of life takes place through the children dreams, dreams that appear archetypal images that center, that is, the symbols of self :

1.      The reflective consciousness, which is the knowledge of self and the ability to have self-awareness;

2.      The interpersonality of human relationships, through which the individual receives information about them;

3.      The ability of human beings to act.

This knowledge that "I" is about "himself" has two distinct aspects: first, a descriptive feature called self - image and on the other, an evaluative aspect, the self-esteem   

That is inherent to patterned people according to their social group and their habits and customs that occurs in primary and secondary.

In the primary - family - already behind the traces of its formation, the secondary group - friends, religion, clubs - will give you their ideological convictions, also kindness, respect and perception of the other as individuation.

Although painful, the process of individuation, is what will free us of a mass life, totally dominated by ego, we follow the thinking of the majority without any personal choice.

The awareness is essential, but it is not everything, it makes us more responsible for ourselves and for our actions, and from there it is up to each person to decide whether or not and to accept this responsibility.

 Achieving self does not mean attaining perfection, but to have a realistic view of himself, and the understanding that the interior progress is something to be worked on throughout his life, as new challenges arise all the time during our existence.
But , an integrated personality will face these challenges with much courage, judgment, balance and serenity.

The logic of the forces of ideas contrary to the new if it is closed minded. The tasks of everyday life will be facing problems, it is important to fully assess the purpose to propose as tolerant and which factors that determine our conduct. It is important that the person is real, honest and sensible. Your actions should be as good for others and for himself.

However, no use of standards and customs anywhere in the world and unfortunately liberalism is misunderstood.

In Brazil still hold hands, kiss in public for common sense is not freedom, it is not only here anywhere in the world, a least another more, whether in Tibet or in Ireland, with clear differences.

If confuses liberalism with libertine, this is one of the biggest obstacles in the concept of freedom of expression.

Libertine is an adjective that qualifies that individual free of any moral sense. It is the dissolute person in his conduct, it is one that has debauched behavior, licentious, depraved. Flee from the usual habits and customs of an era.

Liberalism understand that the meaning of an open person is equal to "an open door: can be opened easily, you can even have some problems, a free and open person" selfishness of the mind is today intolerant.

Women could not vote and even some places may not restrict the sexual aspect and fall into reductionism.

Reconciling the self becomes a mind selfishness, for because of the ignorance that causes anger and lack, want to transform the world in an attitude where assaults both the primary and secondary group becomes one more.

More are mandatory standards for outdoor social behavior that constitute the collective modes of conduct, regarded as desirable by the group, despite restricting and limiting behavior. Are morally taxes and considered essential to the welfare of the group. When it breaks one more, there are moral disapproval and even vigorous sanction.

It has several meanings. For Stonequist is the marginal personality: the marginal man is one who, through migration, education, marriage or some other influences, leaving a social or cultural group without making a satisfactory adjustment on another and is on the edge of both without belonging to none.
And this may be modeling for terrorism by a social group more we are seeing in the world.

Cultural condition where a social category is under the influence of another category, but due to cultural barriers finds himself prevented from participating fully and legitimately the group's influence (traditional and modern society, majority and ethnic minority etc.).

Lewis believes that marginality is synonymous with culture of poverty: composed of a set of norms, values, knowledge, beliefs and technology that is organized and used by individuals of a society in order to allow them to adapt to the environment in which they live; main features: lack of effective participation and integration in the key institutions.

The high population density, poor housing and a minimum of organization; childhood absence, early initiation of sex, home abandonment, families centered on the mother; feelings of hopelessness and dependency.

Finally, Quijano considers lack of integration: is not a basic way of belonging and participate in the general structure of society. The More is a problem inherent in the structure of any society and varies in each historical moment that can be destructive or constructive long as there is respect. The more absorbs ideas becomes clear and new knowledge takes place new shares.

Creating a new reality with more freedom and create arguments to be applied, and revealing a new convenience that breaks the camouflaged stereotypes in a false dogmatic, ideological and real conservatism in the selfishness of his thoughts that misrepresents the reality of ideas in the space that lives and becomes intolerant with different.

Uncertainties are there? Is there too much intolerance? Or too much tolerance? In the uses and customs by a minority that runs the rules and exaggerates the dose?

The other has to respect what gives you respect? Abuse within the supposed freedom of expression affect the understanding of love?

The mind can and should become for the better, talk impurities and all day is different self, looking here and there to analyze carefully the behavior certainly intolerances would be less since we wake up to sleep.

Talk about a global peace and learn to live in harmony with others is difficult in today's world, in a recent survey in Europe, Europeans associated terrorism with refugees, historically so close, mentally so far, 60% in some countries in the survey agreed this fact and once again runs away from the universal responsibility of freedom, of course without being more.

By paying attention to external things of little value to inner growth, it's easy to see the world as an illusion, the spotlight of the media and their editors play stereotypes on the small screen, young governed by these factors act as intolerant phenomena becoming a More.

For this, be liberal are required patience and tolerance among the utopias and dogmas that emphasize more hate than love.

Have compassion, hard word for some dogmatists, it is the root of altruism, not violent, not harmful, not aggressive but, not to be confused with affection and social change.

 Social change is all the transformation, observable in time, which affects, so that is not temporary or ephemeral, the structure and functioning of the social organization of a given society and changes the course of history. It is the change of structure resulting from the historical action of certain factors or certain groups within the given community (Rocher).

And be liberal is to be aware of these changes, both personal and collective free of oppression and hatred.